Brookdale Inn and Spa et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Certificate of Insurance No. E10NF16040 et al
||Brookdale Inn and Spa, Sanjiv Kakkar and Neelam Kakkar
||Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Certificate of Insurance No. E10NF16040 and Does 1-25
||June 6, 2013
||US District Court for the Northern District of California
||San Jose Office
||Edward J. Davila
||Howard R. Lloyd
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 13, 2014
ORDER granting 6 Motion to Compel; denying 6 Motion to Dismiss; granting 6 Motion to Stay. The Clerk shall ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/13/2014. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2014)
|October 29, 2013
ORDER FOR FURTHER BRIEFING; VACATING AND SUBMITTING MOTION. On or before November 15, 2013, Plaintiffs and Defendant may each file one additional brief, not to exceed 5 pages, addressing the impact of Sonic-Calabasas on the issues presented by De fendants pending Motion to Compel Arbitration, Dismiss or Stay. See Docket Item No. No responsive briefs should be filed. With this additional briefing, the court has determined that Defendant's Motion is suitable for decision without oral argum ent pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Accordingly, the hearing scheduled for November 1, 2013, is VACATED and the motion will be deemed submitted upon conclusion of the briefing ordered herein. ***11/1/2013 Hearing/Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/29/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2013)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?