Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC v. Millennial Media, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC
Defendant:
Millennial Media Inc.
Case Number:
5:2013cv04206
Filed:
September 17, 2013
Court:
California Northern District Court
Office:
San Jose Office
County:
XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:
Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit:
Patent
Cause of Action:
35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By:
Both
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| June 23, 2014 | 128 |
ORDER to show cause re consolidation. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/23/14. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014)
|
| June 11, 2014 | 126 |
ORDER granting 113 Motion to Stay signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on June 11, 2014. (ejdlc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)
|
| December 26, 2013 | 112 |
ORDER GRANTING 111 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Millennial Media Inc. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/28/2014. Case Management Conference set for 3/7/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/26/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2013)
|
| October 8, 2013 | 99 |
ORDER re 95 request for withdrawal of counsel. Lori R. Mason terminated as counsel of record for Cooley LLP. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/8/2013. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2013)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.