Caballero v. Doan et al
| Amadeo Caballero |
| Thanh Doan, U. S. Bank, N.A., Does 1-100, inclusive and All Persons Unknown Claiming any Legal |
| 5:2013cv05756 |
| December 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| All Other Real Property |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER by Judge Beth Labson Freeman granting 9 Motion to Dismiss; granting 32 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2014)
|
|
Filing
31
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 6/19/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, 280 South First Street San Jose, CA 95113 before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Hearing will be vacated unless written request is received at least ten (10) days in advance of the 06/19/2014 hearing, requesting a hearing from the Plaintiff. Notice of this hearing to be sent to Plaintiff by certified mail. Parties may appear at Motion to Dismiss hearing by Courtcall without further approval of the court.Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 05/09/2014. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - Case Management Conference set for 5/6/2014 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 04/21/2014. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
