Mjuan Carlos Martinez v. Trung Q. Le et al
| Juan Carlos Martinez |
| Trung Q. Le and Letech Manufacturing, Inc. |
| 5:2014cv02945 |
| June 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal granting 46 and amending ECF No. 49 . (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2016)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal granting 46 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2016)
|
|
Filing
43
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 8, 2016 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016)
|
|
Filing
36
VERDICT FORM. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on February 23, 2016 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2016)
|
|
Filing
31
PRELIMINARY JURY INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on February 22, 2016 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2016)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Paul S. Grewal on October 13, 2015 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2015)
|
|
Filing
15
CASE SCHEDULING ORDER re 12 , 13 Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on November 10, 2014 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
