Scott F Savage v. Citibank N.A. et al
Scott F Savage |
Citibank N.A., Department Stores National Bank and FDS Bank |
5:2014cv03633 |
August 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Cruz |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Other Statutory Actions |
47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 ORDER RE 82 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/25/2016. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2016) |
Filing 72 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 65 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 8/14/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2015) |
Filing 64 ORDER APPROVING 63 STIPULATION TO OTHER DEADLINES. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 6/24/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2015) |
Filing 49 ORDER DENYING 23 MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 5/12/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2015) |
Filing 22 ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule on Defendants' Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Action. Re-noticed motion due by 11/14/2014. Response due by 12/4/2014. Reply due by 12/17/2014. Motion Hearing set for 2/5/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 11/13/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.