Orange County IBEW-NECA Labor Management Cooperation Committee et al v. Pro Tech Engineering Corporation
| Orange County IBEW-NECA Labor Management Cooperation Committee, NECA-IBEW Family Medical Care Plan, Orange County IBEW-NECA Electrical Workers Defined Contribution Plan, Orange County Electrical Joint Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund, Electrical Industry Administrative Maintenance Fund, National Electrical Benefit Fund and Douglas Chappell |
| Pro Tech Engineering Corporation |
| 5:2014cv04225 |
| September 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1131 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on February 25, 2016. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2016)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on December 10, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2015)
|
|
Filing
34
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on September 24, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2015)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh denying 25 Motion to Transfer Case (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
