Tenerelli v. Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company et al
Dominick Tenerelli |
Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation |
5:2015cv00012 |
January 2, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Nathanael M. Cousins |
Beth Labson Freeman |
Other Labor Litigation |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER LIFTING STAY AND SETTING CASE SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/7/2015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2015) |
Filing 48 ORDER GRANTING 37 LAW OFFICES OF TANYA GOMERMAN'S EX PARTE MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORDS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/3/2015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2015) |
Filing 41 ORDER DIRECTING COUNSEL AND PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/20/2015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2015) |
Filing 26 ORDER GRANTING 23 DEFENDANT LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER TO ASSERT A COUNTERCLAIM FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/24/0015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2015) |
Filing 16 ORDER VACATING Case Management Conference and SETTING CASE SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/7/2015. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.