Clifford Chance LLP v. GAC Real Estate Partners, LLC
Plaintiff: Clifford Chance LLP
Defendant: GAC Real Estate Partners, LLC
Case Number: 5:2015cv00181
Filed: January 13, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Outside US
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 13, 2015 re 19 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2015)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clifford Chance LLP v. GAC Real Estate Partners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clifford Chance LLP
Represented By: Mary Hensinger Haas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GAC Real Estate Partners, LLC
Represented By: David William Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?