Miller v. Stanford Health Care et al
Danielle Miller |
Stanford Health Care, Atlantech Medical Device Ltd., ArthroCare Corporation, ArthroCare Medical Corporation, Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Smith & Nephew PLC |
5:2015cv02389 |
May 29, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Nathanael M. Cousins |
Personal Injury: Health Care |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/28/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2016) |
Filing 51 ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY re 50 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/1/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016) |
Filing 46 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT re 43 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 1/21/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2016) |
Filing 41 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Re: Dkt. No. 40 . Miller is ordered to show cause by 1/20/2016, why the Court should permit her first amended complaint. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 1/13/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2016) |
Filing 21 ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF Defendants Atlantech Medical Device, Inc., ArthroCare Corporation, ArthroCare Medical Corporation, and Smith & Nephew, PLC pursuant to Stipulation 19 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/15/2015. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.