Andrews v. United Rentals (North America), Inc. et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 11, 2016
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT re 62 Clerk's Notice. Stipulated Dismissal or Joint Statement due by 6/30/2016. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/7/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. A ll other pretrial deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED and any pending motions are TERMINATED.Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss the action. Motions terminated: 46 MOTION for Summary J udgment as to United Rentals (North America), Inc.'s Cross-Claim filed by Barreto Manufacturing, Inc., 54 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION filed by Barreto Manufacturing, Inc., 39 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel For Defendant/Cross-Claimant /Cross-Defendant Barreto Manufacturing, Inc. filed by United Rentals (North America), Inc., 45 MOTION for Settlement Motion for Good Faith Settlement Determination Under California CCP Sec. 877.6 filed by Barreto Manufacturing, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/11/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2016)
|April 28, 2016
ORDER granting 55 Stipulation to extend time for the depositions of RICHARD FURLANIC and MARY HUYNH and for the filing of OPPOSITION and reply briefs to Barreto Manufacturing, Inc. pending motion for summary judgment and motion for good faith settlement determination. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/28/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?