Integris Wealth Management, LLC v. Integrys Wealth Advisors, LLC

Plaintiff: Integris Wealth Management, LLC
Defendant: Integrys Wealth Advisors, LLC
Case Number: 5:2015cv03143
Filed: July 7, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1114
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 26, 2015 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Integris Wealth Management, LLC. The Clerk shall close this file. ***Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/26/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2015)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Integris Wealth Management, LLC v. Integrys Wealth Advisors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Integris Wealth Management, LLC
Represented By: Robert Warren Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Integrys Wealth Advisors, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?