Cavness v. Davis

Petitioner: Donald Eugene Cavness-Bey
Respondent: Ronald Davis
Case Number: 5:2015cv03526
Filed: July 31, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Referring Judge: PSLC HHL
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 5, 2015 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. The petition indicates that Petitioner was convicted in Sacramento County which lies within the venue of the Eastern District of California. Accordingly, the above-titled action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The Clerk shall transfer this matter and terminate any pending motions. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/2/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2015)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cavness v. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Donald Eugene Cavness-Bey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ronald Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?