Wu v. Tiffany and Company

Plaintiff: Shirley Wu
Defendant: Tiffany and Company
Case Number: 5:2015cv05287
Filed: November 18, 2015
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 22, 2016 23 Opinion or Order of the Court PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/22/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2016)
January 14, 2016 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO APPEAR AT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Re: Dkt. No. 12 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 1/14/2016. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wu v. Tiffany and Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shirley Wu
Represented By: Jay Richard Strauss
Represented By: David Carpenter Winton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tiffany and Company
Represented By: JoAnna L. Brooks
Represented By: Jose Macias, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?