Hoko v. Transit America Services, Inc
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 18, 2016
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: SETTLEMENT. The parties are ordered to appear on 12/1/2016 at 10:00 AM to show cause why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). On or before 11/23/2016, the parties shall file a joint statement in response to the Order to Show Cause. All other pretrial deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED and any pending motions are TERMINATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/18/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2016)
|July 27, 2016
ORDER VACATING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE set for 8/2/2016. The parties shall contact this Court to reschedule the conference once counsel is appointed. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/27/2016. (Pro Se party notified via email) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2016)
|May 11, 2016
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. Pursuant to ADR Local Rule 7-2, the above-entitled case is referred to Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins for a settlement conference to occur no later than 90 days from the date this order is filed. The parties are instructed to contact Judge Cousins' Courtroom Deputy to arrange a date and time for the conference. The prior order referring this case to mediation (Dkt. No. 23) is VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/11/2016. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2016)
|January 20, 2016
Order Re: Consideration of Related Case Status. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 01/20/2016. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/20/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?