Fox Factory, Inc. v. SRAM, LLC
Fox Factory, Inc. |
SRAM, LLC |
5:2016cv00506 |
January 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Santa Cruz |
William H. Orrick |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 122 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER CASE. This case will be transferred to the District of Colorado. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/08/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2018) |
Filing 105 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/30/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2017) |
Filing 101 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS by Judge William H. Orrick re: (88) Motion to Amend/Correct in case 3:16-cv-00506-WHO and (76) Motion to Amend/Correct in case 3:16-cv-03716-WHO. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2017) |
Filing 100 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER FOR IMPROPER VENUE by Judge William H. Orrick denying (83) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:16-cv-00506-WHO and (71) Motion to Dismiss in case 3:16-cv-03716-WHO. Associated Cases: 3:16-cv-00506-WHO, 3:16-cv-03716-WHO (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2017) |
Filing 81 ORDER re (61 in 3:16-cv-03716-WHO) JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND THE DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF FOX FACTORY' CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEFS. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/23/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2017) |
Filing 53 ORDER granting 52 STIPULATION to Amend the Case Schedule. Deadline to Amend/Add Parties: 7/21/2017. Close of Fact Discovery: 12/20/2017. Dispositive Motion to be heard by 5/30/2018. Tutorial Hearing set for 9/22/2017 09:00 AM and Claims Construc tion Hearing set for 9/29/2017 09:00 AM. Pretrial Conference set for 8/13/2018 02:00 PM and Jury Trial set for 9/10/2018 08:30 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/22/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2017) |
Filing 37 STIPULATION AND ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 8/23/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 8/16/2016. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 07/29/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2016) |
Filing 29 CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/09/2016. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fox Factory, Inc. v. SRAM, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Fox Factory, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Robert Francis McCauley |
Represented By: | Christopher Brian McKinley |
Represented By: | Jeffrey D Smyth |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SRAM, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.