Jean L. v. NetApp, Inc. Group Health Plan

Plaintiff: Jean L.
Defendant: NetApp, Inc. Group Health Plan
Case Number: 5:2016cv02290
Filed: April 27, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Referring Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Presiding Judge: Lucy H. Koh
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
Cause of Action: 29:1132
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 29, 2016 23 Opinion or Order of the Court Case Management Order. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 07/29/2016. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2016)
July 28, 2016 21 Opinion or Order of the Court Proposed Case Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 07/28/2016. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jean L. v. NetApp, Inc. Group Health Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean L.
Represented By: Elizabeth Katherine Green
Represented By: Lisa Sue Kantor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NetApp, Inc. Group Health Plan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?