Rotosound Manufacturing Limited v. Cenveo Corporation

Plaintiff: Rotosound Manufacturing Limited
Defendant: Cenveo Corporation
Case Number: 5:2016cv02379
Filed: May 2, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Paul Singh Grewal
Nature of Suit: Property Damage Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 19, 2016 35 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 34 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 2/2/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/9/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rotosound Manufacturing Limited v. Cenveo Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rotosound Manufacturing Limited
Represented By: Merton A. Howard
Represented By: Kyle Aaron Mabe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cenveo Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?