Moore v. Target

Plaintiff: Kimberley A. Moore
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 5:2016cv02725
Filed: May 19, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Cruz
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 28, 2017 69 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/28/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2017)
December 13, 2016 46 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART TARGET'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Re: Dkt. No. 33 . The Court ORDERS Target to answer the Amended Complaint by Kim Moore within 14 days. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Target
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberley A. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Gail C. Trabish
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?