van Kempen v. Micron Consumer Products Group, Inc.

Plaintiff: Isaak van Kempen
Defendant: Micron Consumer Products Group, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2016cv04612
Filed: August 12, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 4, 2017 45 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/4/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: van Kempen v. Micron Consumer Products Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Micron Consumer Products Group, Inc.
Represented By: Rick John Bergstrom, III
Represented By: Koree Lynn Blyleven
Represented By: Catherine Suzanne Nasser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Isaak van Kempen
Represented By: Gretchen Elizabeth Birkheimer
Represented By: Andrew Field Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?