Ackers v. Yahoo Inc.

Plaintiff: Gregory Ackers
Defendant: Yahoo Inc.
Case Number: 5:2016cv05811
Filed: October 7, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Referring Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Presiding Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 18, 2016 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING 2 PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DEFERRING SERVICE OF PROCESS BY THE UNITED STATES MARSHAL; AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/18/2016. Amended Pleadings due by 12/19/2016. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ackers v. Yahoo Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Ackers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Yahoo Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?