Martin et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al
| Demetrius Martin, Omar Atebar, Esther Vega and Jesus Vega |
| Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd |
| 3:2016cv06391 |
| November 2, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Jeffrey S. White |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
128
ORDER GRANTING 112 DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/24/2020.(blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/24/2020)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER by Judge Beth Labson Freeman Granting 93 Motion to Reopen Case; Denying 96 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. (mdllcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2020)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER GRANTING WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 69 MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/30/2018. (blflc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2018)
|
|
Filing
40
Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases 17-cv-1561-HRL and 16-cv-6391-BLF signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 5/1/2017. (hrllc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2017)
|
|
Filing
32
SUA SPONTE Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases 17-cv-01570 NC and 16-cv-06391 BLF. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 4/3/2017. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
