Alfaro v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Plaintiff: Yarita Alfaro
Defendant: Sears Roebuck and Company
Case Number: 5:2017cv03588
Filed: June 21, 2017
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Edward J. Davila
Referring Judge: Howard R. Lloyd
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 8, 2017 18 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 16 MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE ATTORNEY. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/8/2017. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alfaro v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sears Roebuck and Company
Represented By: Carrie Anne Gonell
Represented By: Nancy My Ngoc Nguyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yarita Alfaro
Represented By: Bernard James Fitzpatrick
Represented By: Charles Swanston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?