Gonzalez v. Ford Motor Company
Jose Gonzalez |
Ford Motor Company and Power Ford |
5:2017cv05885 |
October 13, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Lucy H Koh |
Contract Product Liability |
15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from the Northern District of California has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 2:18-cv-00943. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2018) |
Filing 30 TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, that the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside the Central District of California are transferred to the Central District of California to become part of MDL 2814. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2018) |
Filing 29 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of JPML Order Establishing Multidistrict Litigation (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 2/5/2018) |
Filing 28 Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh in case 5:17-cv-05613-LHK; Granting (20) Administrative Motion Stay in case 5:17-cv-05885-LHK.Associated Cases: 5:17-cv-05885-LHK, 5:17-cv-05613-LHK, 5:17-cv-05615-LHK, 5:17-cv-05620-LHK, 5:17-cv-05698-LHK, 5:17-cv-05704-LHK, 5:17-cv-05705-LHK, 5:17-cv-05706-LHK, 5:17-cv-05711-LHK, 5:17-cv-05712-LHK, 5:17-cv-05747-LHK, 5:17-cv-05750-LHK, 5:17-cv-05751-LHK, 5:17-cv-05900-LHK, 5:17-cv-05915-LHK, 5:17-cv-05922-LHK, 5:17-cv-05924-LHK, 5:17-cv-05925-LHK, 5:17-cv-05927-LHK, 5:17-cv-05978-LHK, 5:17-cv-05996-LHK, 5:17-cv-06022-LHK, 5:17-cv-06121-LHK, 5:17-cv-06128-LHK, 5:17-cv-06201-LHK, 5:17-cv-06205-LHK, 5:17-cv-06210-LHK, 5:17-cv-06222-LHK. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2017) |
Filing 26 Defendant Ford Motor Company's ANSWER to Amended Complaint for Violation of Statutory Obligations byFord Motor Company. (Cunningham, Jason) (Filed on 11/13/2017) |
Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss , or Alternately to Strike, Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 2/15/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 11/27/2017. Replies due by 12/4/2017. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paul R. Johnson in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or Alternately to Strike, #2 Proposed Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss or Alternately to Strike)(Cunningham, Jason) (Filed on 11/13/2017) |
Filing 24 ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/13/2017. (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017) |
Filing 23 Supplemental Brief re #20 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Stay All Proceedings and Deadlines (attaching Judge Birotte's stay orders) filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit F - 26 C.D. Cal. stay orders)(Related document(s) #20 ) (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 11/13/2017) |
Filing 22 First MOTION to Remand to Santa Clara Superior Court filed by Jose Gonzalez. Motion Hearing set for 2/22/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 11/24/2017. Replies due by 12/1/2017. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Declaration, #4 Proposed Order)(Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 11/10/2017) |
Filing 21 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #20 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Stay All Proceedings and Deadlines ) filed byJose Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Request for Judicial Notice, #2 Proposed Order)(Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 11/7/2017) |
Filing 20 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION To Stay All Proceedings and Deadlines filed by Ford Motor Company. Responses due by 11/7/2017. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Paul R. Johnson, #2 Exhibit A - Ford JPML motion, #3 Exhibit B - Ford JPML memorandum, #4 Exhibit C - Ford JPML schedule of cases, #5 Exhibit D - meet-and-confer email, #6 Exhibit E - meet-and-confer reply, #7 Proposed Order)(Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 11/3/2017) |
Filing 19 Summons Issued as to Power Ford. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2017) |
Filing 18 Proposed Summons. (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 10/30/2017) |
Filing 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Violation of Statutory Obligations against All Defendants. Filed byJose Gonzalez. (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 10/30/2017) |
Filing 16 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for 1/17/2018 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due 7-days before the scheduled conference date. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice.) (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017) |
Filing 15 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrtae Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to the case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committee on 10/25/2017. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017) Modified on 10/25/2017 (bwS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2017) |
Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jose Gonzalez.. (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 10/24/2017) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re 6 Case Assigned by Intake,,, #7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, 5 Case Assigned by Intake,,, (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/20/2017) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Rowena Guillermo Santos (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 10/19/2017) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Rowena Guillermo Santos (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 10/19/2017) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Notice to State Court Clerk and Adverse Parties of Removal to Federal Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/17/2017) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Answer filed in State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Answer filed in State Court)(Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2018 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2017) |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/27/2017. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2017) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/27/2017. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2017) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/13/2017) |
Filing 3 Statement Disclosure Statement of Defendant Ford Motor Company [FRCP 7.1] by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/13/2017) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company re #1 Notice of Removal,, (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/13/2017) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 17CV315488. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-11795778). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Summons, #2 Exhibit B- Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C- Complaint, #4 Exhibit D- Alternative Dispute Resolution Information Sheet, #5 Exhibit E- 2016- Ford's SEC Form 10-K, #6 Exhibit F- Declaration of Spencer Hugret, #7 Exhibit G- Time Report, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/13/2017) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.