Ho v. Pinsukanjana, et al.
Plaintiff: Rita C Ho
Defendant: Mark Pinsukanjana, Bryan Yedinak and Architektur
Case Number: 5:2017cv06520
Filed: November 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 133 ORDER by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton adopting in part 122 Report and Recommendations as to 93 Motion for Sanctions. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2019)
February 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 90 Discovery Order. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 2/20/2019. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2019)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 84 Discovery Order: Scheduling Telephonic Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 2/12/2019. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2019)
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER DENYING MOTION 80 FOR RELIEF FROM NON-DISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019)
January 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 78 Discovery Order re: 69 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Mark Pinsukanjana, 68 MOTION to Quash or Modify, or Limit Subpoena filed by Mark Pinsukanjana, 72 First Discovery Letter Brief filed by Mark Pinsukanjana. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 1/24/2019. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2019)
January 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 75 Discovery Order re: 74 First MOTION to Compel Responses to Discovery Requests filed by Rita C. Ho, Rita C Ho. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 1/22/2019. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2019)
May 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton adopting 51 Report and Recommendations; denying 13 Motion to Strike; denying 34 Supplemental Motion to Strike; denying 14 Motion for Temporary Asset Restraining Order. (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2018)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ho v. Pinsukanjana, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rita C Ho
Represented By: Allen J. Baden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mark Pinsukanjana
Represented By: Roger Louis Meredith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bryan Yedinak
Represented By: Roger Louis Meredith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Architektur
Represented By: Roger Louis Meredith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?