Baruck Bros Investments, LLC v. MM Acquisition Co., LLC
| Baruck Bros Investments, LLC |
| MM Acquisition Co., LLC |
| 5:2017cv06642 |
| November 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Monterey |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Remark: Acknowledgment of Received Remanded case from Monterey County Superior Court (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2017) |
| Filing 10 Remark: Case Remanded to Monterey County Superior Court per document #9 Order Withdrawing Notice of Removal and Remanding Action to State Court. (Attachments: #1 Certified Order) (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/28/2017: #2 Certified Docket) (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9
ORDER WITHDRAWING NOTICE OF REMOVAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1441(a) AND REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT, granting ECF No. #8 . The Court, having reviewed and considered the jointly-filed Stipulation For Order Withdrawing Notice Of Removal Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. 1441(a) and Remanding Action To State Court, hereby orders that the Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1441(a) filed in this action on November 17, 2017 be withdrawn and that this case be remanded to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Monterey. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins on 11/27/2017. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2017)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #1 Notice of Removal, Withdrawing Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1441(a) and Remanding Action to State Court filed by Baruck Bros Investments, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Withdrawing Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1441(a) and Remanding Action to State Court)(Boren, Stephen) (Filed on 11/27/2017) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Re: Dkt. No. #1 . MM Acquisition Co. must file a response to this order by 12/6/2017. Both parties must indicate whether they consent or decline the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge by 12/6/2017. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 11/21/2017. (Attachments: #1 Consent/Declination)(lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2017)
|
| Filing 6 **Filing Error** Proposed Summons. (Wood, Andrew) (Filed on 11/20/2017) Modified on 11/20/2017 (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
| Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #6 Proposed Summons filed by MM Acquisition Co., LLC **Summons will not be issued. Defendant has already been served with complaint** (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2017) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/14/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/21/2018 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7, 4th Floor, San Jose. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2017) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/1/2017. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2017) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBITS re #1 Notice of Removal, filed byMM ACQUISITION CO., LLC. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Wood, Andrew) (Filed on 11/17/2017) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by MM ACQUISITION CO., LLC identifying Other Affiliate MONTEREY VENTURE HOLDING COMPANY, LLC for MM ACQUISITION CO., LLC. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Wood, Andrew) (Filed on 11/17/2017) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from MONTEREY COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Their case number is 17CV004170. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-11887371). Filed byMM ACQUISITION CO., LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wood, Andrew) (Filed on 11/17/2017) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baruck Bros Investments, LLC v. MM Acquisition Co., LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MM Acquisition Co., LLC | |
| Represented By: | Randolf Warner Katz |
| Represented By: | Andrew Alexander Wood |
| Represented By: | Michael Donn Mortenson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Baruck Bros Investments, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Zachary Boren |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
