Hsu v. United States of America

Petitioner: Hsiu-Ying Hsu
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 5:2017cv06656
Filed: November 17, 2017
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Jose Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Nathanael M. Cousins
Nature of Suit: IRS-Third Party
Cause of Action: 26:7609
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 16, 2018 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING PART MOTION TO QUASH. Re: Dkt. No 1 in 5:17-cv-06697-NC, 5:17-cv-06656-NC, 5:17-cv-06698-NC, and 5:17-cv-06696-NC. Joint status report due by 8/1/2018. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/16/2018. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hsu v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Hsiu-Ying Hsu
Represented By: Richard Todd Luoma, Luoma
Represented By: Betty Jean Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?