Veal v. LendingClub Corporation et al
| Matthew Veal |
| LendingClub Corporation, Renaud Laplanche, Scott Sanborn, Bradley Coleman, Thomas W. Casey and Carrie L. Dolan |
| 3:2018cv02599 |
| May 2, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Sonoma |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 96 WITH LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 6/12/2020. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2020)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE TO JULY 9, 2020 AT 11:00 A.M. Initial Case Management Conference set for 7/9/2020 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 7/2/2020. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 5/8/2020. (tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2020)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER GRANTING 67 and 69 MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/4/2019. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2019)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER GRANTING 21 LENDINGCLUB INVESTOR GROUP'S MOTION TO APPOINT LEAD PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL; DENYING 17 RAVI MALLUR'S MOTION TO APPOINT; VACATING NOVEMBER 15, 2018 HEARING. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/7/2018. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
