Schwartz v. Jahn
| Mary Louise Schwartz, F |
| George Jahn |
| 5:2018cv05784 |
| September 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Beth Labson Freeman |
| Susan van Keulen |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/14/2018. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2018)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/22/2018. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2018)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Statement due by 1/17/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/24/2019 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(tshS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2018) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings pursuant to Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment to a U.S. District Court Judge. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen remain as referral judge assigned to the case. Reassignment Order signed Executive Committee on 10/19/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2018)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (djm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2018) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Mary Louise Schwartz, F.. (Armenta, Maria) (Filed on 10/17/2018) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 10/25/2018. Please note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. Form is attached and also available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2018) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/1/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/8/2019 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/5/2018. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Mary Louise Schwartz, F. (Armenta, Maria) (Filed on 9/21/2018) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Armenta, Maria) (Filed on 9/21/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against George Jahn. Filed byMary Louise Schwartz, F. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Armenta, Maria) (Filed on 9/21/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schwartz v. Jahn | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Louise Schwartz, F | |
| Represented By: | Maria Cristina Armenta |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: George Jahn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
