Maielua-Gil v. Caine & Weiner Company, Inc
Tiffany Maielua-Gil |
Caine & Weiner Company, Inc |
5:2018cv06359 |
October 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tiffany Maielua-Gil. Caine & Weiner Company, Inc served on 11/9/2018, answer due 11/30/2018. (Kent, Trinette) (Filed on 11/13/2018) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tiffany Maielua-Gil.. (Kent, Trinette) (Filed on 10/18/2018) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Caine & Weiner Company, Inc. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2018) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/9/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/16/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 7, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2018) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/31/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2018) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Tiffany Maielua-Gil . (Kent, Trinette) (Filed on 10/17/2018) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Kent, Trinette) (Filed on 10/17/2018) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caine & Weiner Company, Inc ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12770735.). Filed byTiffany Maielua-Gil. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kent, Trinette) (Filed on 10/17/2018) |
#Electronic filing error. Incorrect PDF attached. [err201] for the civil cover sheet only. Please re-file your civil cover sheet only for the correct plaintiff. This filing will no t be processed by the clerks office. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Tiffany Maielua-Gil (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Maielua-Gil v. Caine & Weiner Company, Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tiffany Maielua-Gil | |
Represented By: | Trinette Gragirena Kent |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Caine & Weiner Company, Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.