Neo4j, Inc. v. PureThink, LLC et al
| Neo4j, Inc. and Neo4j Sweden AB |
| John Mark Suhy, iGov, Inc. and PureThink, LLC |
| 5:2018cv07182 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1051 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 46
Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants Amended ANSWER to Counterclaim byNeo4j Sweden AB, Neo4j, Inc.. (Chien, Cary) (Filed on 10/31/2019)
|
|
Filing 45
Order granting #44 Stipulation for Leave to File Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant's First Amended Answer. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/31/2019. (ejdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2019)
|
|
Filing 44
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (JOINT) FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFF AND COUNTER-DEFENDANTS FIRST AMENDED ANSWER filed by Neo4j Sweden AB, Neo4j, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Chien, Cary) (Filed on 10/30/2019)
|
|
Filing 43
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice #41 Administrative Motion ; Denying #42 Stipulation Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/29/2019. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2019)
|
|
Filing 42
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #41 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Consider Whether Cases Should be Related filed by Neo4j Sweden AB, Neo4j, Inc.. (Chien, Cary) (Filed on 10/28/2019)
|
|
Filing 41
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION Consider Whether Cases Should be Related filed by Neo4j, Inc.. Responses due by 11/1/2019. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Cary Chien iso Plaintiff's Stipulated Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Chien, Cary) (Filed on 10/28/2019)
|
|
Filing 40
NOTICE of Appearance by Cary Chien (Chien, Cary) (Filed on 10/28/2019)
|
|
Filing 39
Certificate of Interested Entities by Neo4j Sweden AB identifying Other Affiliate Sunstone Technology Ventures Fund II K/S, Other Affiliate Europe Ventures L.P., Other Affiliate Greenbridge Investment Partners Limited, Other Affiliate One Peak Expansion Europe LP for Neo4j Sweden AB. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/24/2019)
|
|
Filing 38
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Neo4j Sweden AB identifying Corporate Parent Neo4j, Inc. for Neo4j Sweden AB. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/24/2019)
|
|
Filing 37
AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint for: (1) Trademark Infringement; (2) False Designation of Origin; (3) False Advertising; (4) Federal and State Unfair Competition; (5) Breach of Contract; (6) Invasion of Privacy; and (7) Violations of the DMCA against PureThink, LLC, John Mark Suhy, iGov, Inc.. Filed byNeo4j, Inc., Neo4j Sweden AB. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/23/2019)
|
|
Filing 36
Order granting #35 Stipulation For Leave To File First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/22/2019. (ejdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2019)
|
|
Filing 35
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation for Leave to File First Amended Complaint filed by Neo4j, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed First Amended Complaint)(Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 10/22/2019)
|
|
Filing 34
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER #33 . Signed by Judge Susan van Keulen on 10/2/19. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2019)
|
|
Filing 33
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Protective Order filed by Neo4j, Inc.. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 9/30/2019)
|
|
***Set Deadlines/Hearings per ECF #32 Order: Close of Expert Discovery due by 6/1/2020. Close of Fact Discovery due by 2/28/2020. Trial Setting Conference Statement due by 1/21/2020. Trial Setting Conference set for 1/30/2020 11:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. Dispositive and Daubert Motions due by 7/17/2020. Responses due by 8/17/2020. Replies due by 9/4/2020. Opening Reports due by 4/1/2020. Rebuttal Reports due by 5/1/2020. Dispositive and Daubert Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2020 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Judge Edward J. Davila. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2019)
|
|
Filing 32
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/22/2019. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2019)
|
|
Filing 31
CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Joint Case Management Conference Statement and FRCP 26(f) Report filed by Neo4j, Inc.. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 2/21/2019)
|
|
Filing 30
ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM #22 Counterclaim byNeo4j, Inc.. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 2/21/2019)
|
|
Filing 29
Certificate of Interested Entities by PureThink, LLC, John Mark Suhy, iGov, Inc. (Beene, Adron) (Filed on 2/15/2019)
|
|
Filing 28
Order Granting #26 Stipulation selecting Private ADR Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila.(ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019)
|
|
Filing 27
ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 2/7/2019)
|
|
Filing 26
STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Neo4j, Inc. filed by Neo4j, Inc.. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 2/7/2019)
|
|
Filing 25
Order Granting #24 Stipulation for Extension of Time to to Respond to PURETHINK LLC and IGOV, INC.S #22 Counterclaims Signed by by Judge Edward J. Davila.(ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2019)
|
|
Filing 24
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #22 Counterclaim Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to PureThink LLC and iGov, Inc.'s Counterclaims filed by Neo4j, Inc.. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 1/25/2019)
|
|
Filing 23
ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND , COUNTERCLAIM against PureThink, LLC byJohn Mark Suhy, iGov, Inc., PureThink, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Beene, Adron) (Filed on 1/10/2019)
|
|
Filing 22
COUNTERCLAIM against Neo4j, Inc.. Filed byiGov, Inc., PureThink, LLC. (Beene, Adron) (Filed on 1/9/2019)
|
|
Filing 21
NOTICE of Appearance by Adron W. Beene (Beene, Adron) (Filed on 12/21/2018)
|
|
Filing 20
Corporate Disclosure Statement by PureThink, LLC, John Mark Suhy, iGov, Inc. (Beene, Adron) (Filed on 12/21/2018)
|
|
Filing 19
NOTICE of Appearance by Adron Gustav Beene (Beene, Adron) (Filed on 12/21/2018)
|
|
Filing 18
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by PureThink, LLC, John Mark Suhy, iGov, Inc.. (Beene, Adron) (Filed on 12/21/2018)
|
|
Filing 17
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Neo4j, Inc.. John Mark Suhy served on 11/30/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 12/11/2018)
|
|
Filing 16
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Neo4j, Inc.. iGov, Inc. served on 11/30/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 12/11/2018)
|
|
Filing 15
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Neo4j, Inc.. PureThink, LLC served on 11/30/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 12/11/2018)
|
|
Filing 14
REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding Trademark (cc: form mailed to register). (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2018)
|
|
Filing 13
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras Case Management Statement due by 2/21/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/28/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 12
Summons Issued as to PureThink, LLC. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 11
Summons Issued as to iGov, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 10
Summons Issued as to John Mark Suhy. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 9
Case assigned to Judge Edward J. Davila and Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of Appearance by John V. Picone, III (Picone, John) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Michael Ratinoff (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 6
Rule 7.1 Disclosures by Neo4j, Inc. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 5
Certificate of Interested Entities by Neo4j, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Sunstone Technology Ventures Fund II K/S, Other Affiliate Europe Ventures L.P., Other Affiliate Greenbridge Investment Partners Limited, Other Affiliate One Peak Expansion Europe LP for Neo4j, Inc.. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Summons. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 3
Proposed Summons. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 2
Proposed Summons. (Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for (1) Trademark Infringement; (2) False Designation of Origin; (3) False Advertising; (4) Federal and State Unfair Competition; (5) Breach of Contract; and (6) Invasion of Privacy against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-12880258.). Filed byNeo4j, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ratinoff, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/28/2018)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
