Scott v. Superior Court of California
| Floyd Scott |
| Superior Court of California |
| 5:2018cv07567 |
| December 17, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| PSLC HHL |
| Elizabeth D Laporte |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
***PLEASE DISREGARD AS THIS ORDER WAS FILED IN ERROR AND DUPLICATES THE ORDER FILED ON 1/22/2019*** ORDER to Reassign Case to a District Judge by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2019) Modified on 1/25/2019 (shyS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 1/23/19. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2019)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER to Reassign Case to a District Judge by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 1/23/2019 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2019)
|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge; by Floyd Scott. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2018) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; filed by Floyd Scott. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/31/2018) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge ; (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 1/24/2019. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis ; filed by Floyd Scott. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT; (NO PROCESS); (IFP PENDING); against Superior Court of California. Filed byFloyd Scott. Consent/Declination due by 12/31/2018. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Scott v. Superior Court of California | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Floyd Scott | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Superior Court of California | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
