Alvarez v. City of Gilroy et al
| Maria Alvarez |
| Kenneth Ellsworth, Robert Zuniga, City of Gilroy and Dawn Delfino |
| 5:2019cv02554 |
| May 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward J Davila |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint with JURY DEMAND byCity of Gilroy, Dawn Delfino, Kenneth Ellsworth, Robert Zuniga. (Leed, Claudia) (Filed on 7/8/2019) |
Filing 12
Order Granting #11 Stipulation Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila.The deadline for the Defendants to respond to the Complaint is extended until 7/26/2019.(ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2019)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT filed by City of Gilroy, Dawn Delfino, Kenneth Ellsworth, Robert Zuniga. (Leed, Claudia) (Filed on 7/2/2019) |
| Filing 10 (Text Only) CLERKS NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/3/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/12/2019 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 4, 5th Floor before Hon. Edward J. Davila. The Court does not issue a revised Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ejdorders. This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2019) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 6/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2019)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (pmcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2019) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Maria Alvarez.. (Patterson, Kellan) (Filed on 5/30/2019) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 6/13/2019. (pmc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/30/2019) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to City of Gilroy, Dawn Delfino, Kenneth Ellsworth, Robert Zuniga. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2019) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Patterson, Kellan) (Filed on 5/13/2019) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 8/6/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 8/13/2019 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2019) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 5/28/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2019) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13343050.). Filed byMaria Alvarez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Patterson, Kellan) (Filed on 5/13/2019) |
| #Electronic filing error Re #1 Proposed Summons attached to Complaint filed by Maria Alvarez . This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. The Proposed Summons should not be filed as an attachment to the complaint. Counsel must fill in the Proposed Summons form, including the name(s) of the defendant(s) you are serving and their addresses. Please re-file in its entirety. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
