Krypt, Inc. v. RoPaar LLC
a California corpora Krypt, Inc. and Krypt, Inc. |
ROPAAR LLC and Clay Robinson |
5:2019cv03226 |
June 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Virginia K DeMarchi |
Other Statutory Actions |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting #11 Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice as to Mandi Phillips. (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
Filing 13 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting #10 Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice as to Darin M. Klemchuk. (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
Filing 12 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi granting #9 Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice as to Brian Casper. (vkdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
Filing 11 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice by Mandi Phillips ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13513800.) filed by RoPaar LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Kronenberger, Karl) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
Filing 10 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice by Darin M. Klemchuk ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13513782.) filed by RoPaar LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Kronenberger, Karl) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
Filing 9 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice by Brian Casper ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-13513726.) filed by RoPaar LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Kronenberger, Karl) (Filed on 7/12/2019) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Krypt, Inc.. RoPaar LLC served on 6/30/2019, answer due 7/22/2019. (Dhillon, Harmeet) (Filed on 7/8/2019) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION for Extension of Time for Defendant Ropaar LLC to Respond to Complaint filed by RoPaar LLC. (Rosenfeld, Jeffrey) (Filed on 7/8/2019) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Krypt, Inc... (Dhillon, Harmeet) (Filed on 6/20/2019) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to RoPaar LLC, Clay Robinson. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2019) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/3/2019. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/10/2019 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2019) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Dhillon, Harmeet) (Filed on 6/10/2019) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/24/2019. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-13420033.). Filed byKrypt, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dhillon, Harmeet) (Filed on 6/7/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.