US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Air Systems Inc
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission |
Air Systems Inc |
5:2019cv07574 |
November 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Lucy H Koh |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Service waived by Air Systems Inc waiver sent on 12/6/2019, answer due 2/4/2020. (Cheung, Raymond) (Filed on 12/31/2019) |
Filing 10 REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to AIR SYSTEMS, INC., c/o CSC - Lawyers Incorporating Service, statutory agent on 12/6/2019 by US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed Waiver of Service due by 1/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Cheung, Raymond) (Filed on 12/19/2019) |
Filing 9 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for February 26, 2020 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. The Joint Case Management Statement is due 7 days prior. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (kedS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 11/21/2019. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2019) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2019) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.. (Cheung, Raymond) (Filed on 11/21/2019) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Air Systems Inc. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2019) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Pilot Program for Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/12/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/19/2020 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2019) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/2/2019. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2019) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Cheung, Raymond) (Filed on 11/18/2019) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION against Air Systems Inc. Filed byUS Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cheung, Raymond) (Filed on 11/18/2019) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Air Systems Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Air Systems Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission | |
Represented By: | Raymond T. Cheung |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.