Arasan Chip Systems, Inc. v. Stream TV Networks, Inc.
Arasan Chip Systems, Inc. |
Stream TV Networks, Inc. |
5:2020cv01848 |
March 16, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Susan van Keulen |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Arasan Chip Systems, Inc.. Stream TV Networks, Inc. served on 3/18/2020, answer due 4/8/2020. (Nichani, Vinod) (Filed on 3/27/2020) |
#Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety using correct event "Summons Returned Executed" Re: #5 Certificate of Service fil ed by Arasan Chip Systems, Inc. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2020) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Arasan Chip Systems, Inc... (Nichani, Vinod) (Filed on 3/26/2020) |
Filing 5 ***INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED WHEN POSTING DOCUMENT ***CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Arasan Chip Systems, Inc. re #4 Summons Issued (Nichani, Vinod) (Filed on 3/26/2020) Modified text on 3/27/2020 (dhmS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Stream TV Networks, Inc.. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2020) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/9/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/16/2020 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2020) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/30/2020. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Stream TV Networks, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-14284207.). Filed byArasan Chip Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Nichani, Vinod) (Filed on 3/16/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Arasan Chip Systems, Inc. v. Stream TV Networks, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Stream TV Networks, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Arasan Chip Systems, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Vinod Nichani |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.