v. In Re DMCA Subpoena to YouTube, LLC
Marshall Daniels |
YouTube, LLC |
In Re DMCA Subpoena to YouTube, LLC |
5:2020cv05432 |
August 6, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Other Statutory Actions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Application for Refund re #1 Petition, Electronic Filing Error,, Receipt Number 0971-14781308 by Marshall Daniels. (Armenta, Maria) (Filed on 9/29/2020) |
#Electronic filing error. Please submit request for refund in active case 3:20-mc-80143-JCS. The form to request a refund can be found on the Court's web site. https://cand. uscourts.gov/forms/civil-forms/This case will be closed at the end of September 2020. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2020) |
Filing 1 PETITION to Clerk for Issuance of Subpoena against YouTube, LLC (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-14781308). Filed byMarshall Daniels. (Attachments: #1 Subpoena)(Armenta, Maria) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
This case is a Misc. case and must be filed in paper form, not electronically. The fee for a Misc. case is $47.00. Please go to the courts website to request a refund: https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/about/clerks-office/finance/contacting-the-finance-unit/ #Electronic filing error. Re: #1 Petition filed by Marshall Daniels (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.