Sandridge v. Yanna Technologies, LLC et al
Gregg Sandridge |
Yanna Technologies, LLC, Rajesh Puri and Yaana, Inc. |
5:2020cv08632 |
December 7, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Nathanael M Cousins |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Gregg Sandridge.. (North, Stacy) (Filed on 1/4/2021) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE RE: Consent or Declination. All parties are requested to file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 1/21/2021. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2020) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Rajesh Puri, Yaana, Inc., Yanna Technologies, LLC. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2020) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (North, Stacy) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 3/3/2 021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/10/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) |
#Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]. The summons should be uploaded separately and not as part of, or as an attachment to, the complaint or other initiating documents. The court discourages the use of multiple summonses, but if they are used, they should be uploaded as a single PDF document.This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety as Proposed Summons. Re:[1-2, 1-3, 1-4] Summons re Rajesh Puri, Summons re Yaana Technologies LLC, Summons re Yaana, Inc., filed by Gregg Sandridge (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2020) Modified on 12/8/2020 (sfbS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/21/2020. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2020) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Plaintiff Greg Sandridge's Complaint and Demand for Jury against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15283321.). Filed byGregg Sandridge. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover, #2 Summons Summons re Rajesh Puri, #3 Summons Summons re Yaana Technologies, LLC, #4 Summons Summons re Yaana, Inc.)(North, Stacy) (Filed on 12/7/2020) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.