Oppenheimer v. Prutton
| David Oppenheimer |
| Douglas A Prutton |
| 5:2021cv01382 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Douglas A Prutton.. (Prutton, Douglas) (Filed on 4/16/2021) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint byDouglas A Prutton. (Prutton, Douglas) (Filed on 4/16/2021) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety as Summons Returned Executed. Re: #7 Certificate of Service filed by David Oppenheim er (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2021) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by David Oppenheimer (Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 4/1/2021) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by David Oppenheimer.. (Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 3/11/2021) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Douglas A Prutton. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2021) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/19/2021. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/26/2021 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sfbS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2021) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/11/2021. (anjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2021) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 2/25/2021) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Douglas A Prutton ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0971-15623112.). Filed byDavid Oppenheimer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Townsend, Lawrence) (Filed on 2/25/2021) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Oppenheimer v. Prutton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Oppenheimer | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence Griffith Townsend |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Douglas A Prutton | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Allen Prutton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
