Acosta v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
| Jaime Acosta |
| JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association |
| 5:2022cv03621 |
| June 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/5/2022. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association re #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, #5 Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Declaration in Support, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, (Ammons, David) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
| Filing 5 Request for Judicial Notice re #1 Notice of Removal, filed byJPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Ammons, David) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
| Filing 4 Declaration in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, filed byJPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Ammons, David) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
| Filing 3 Rule 7.1 Disclosures by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association re #1 Notice of Removal, (Ammons, David) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association identifying Corporate Parent JPMorgan Chase & Co., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Inc. for JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Ammons, David) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 22CV397830. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-17279789). Filed byJPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ammons, David) (Filed on 6/21/2022) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Acosta v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jaime Acosta | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association | |
| Represented By: | David W. Ammons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
