Muniz v. King
| Tina M. Muniz |
| Michelle King, SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Acting Commissioner Leland Dudek |
| 5:2025cv00695 |
| January 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Noel Wise |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 SSA Administrative Transcript Notice of Lodging Certified Administrative Record in Electronic Form by Leland Dudek. (Attachments: #1 Part 1, #2 Part 2, #3 Part 3, #4 Part 4, #5 Part 5, #6 Part 6, #7 Part 7, #8 Part 8, #9 Part 9, #10 Part 10, #11 Part 11, #12 Part 12, #13 Part 13, #14 Part 14, #15 Part 15, #16 Part 16, #17 Part 17, #18 Part 18, #19 Part 19, #20 Part 20, #21 Part 21)(Johann, Pamela) (Filed on 3/18/2025) |
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE.IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Nol Wise in the San Jose Division for all further proceedings.1. All future filings shall bear the initials NW immediately after the case number.2. All case management conference dates are vacated and will be reset by the Court.3. All hearing dates presently scheduled are VACATED. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be RENOTICED for hearing before Judge Wise by the moving party for a date consistent with the Courts law and motion calendar, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule.4. Deadlines for ADR compliance and discovery cutoffs remain unchanged.5. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set for after May 27, 2025, and all other deadlines associated with the case, will remain in place unless otherwise ordered.6. All pretrial conference and trial dates scheduled on or before May 27, 2025 are vacated. Other pretrial deadlines (eg., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) will remain in place. The Court will notify the parties when a status conference will be held to schedule a new pretrial conference and trial dates for affected cases.7. Matters currently referred to a Magistrate Judge will remain before that Magistrate Judge absent further notice.8. On or before March 17, 2025, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement (separate statements are appropriate if either party is proceeding without counsel). The statement should not exceed ten pages in length and should address all issues outlines in the #Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District. the approved form for such statements can be accessed #here: a. The parties are not required to complete a section if inapplicable. As number 20, the statement shall provide the following information: (i) a list or description of each party; (ii) a summary of all claims, counter-claims, cross-claims, or third party claims and the date the complaint and cross-complaint(s) were filed; and (iii) a brief procedural history of the case (chart format welcomed) including, but not limited to, any ADR proceedings or settlement conferences that have been scheduled or concluded and any appellate proceedings that are pending or concluded. b. If the parties believe that an immediate case management conference is needed, the parties shall explain why and identify the urgent matters that require attention. If there is no immediate need, a case management conference will be scheduled or reset pursuant to Paragraph 2 of this Order as needed. 9. The Joint Case Management Statement will not constitute a motion to extend or modify dates. If emergency relief is needed to modify a deadline, and the deadline is not of the type that can be modified via stipulation of the parties without a court order, the requesting party or parties shall additionally file a motion or stipulation for such relief in compliance with Local Rule 6.IT IS SO ORDERED.Dated: 02/24/2025FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEMark B. Busby, Clerk of Court (kab-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2025)
|
| This case is directly assigned to District Judge Noel Wise. Judge Jon S. Tigar no longer assigned to the case. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) (kab-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2025) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by Erin Highland on behalf of Michelle King (Highland, Erin) (Filed on 1/30/2025) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 01/29/2025. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2025)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2025) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Tina M. Muniz.. (Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 1/28/2025) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RELATE CASES (ECF No. 25 in Case 5:22-cv-02074-EJD). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/28/2025. (crr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2025)
|
| Filing 6 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2025) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2025)
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/5/2025. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2025) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Tina M. Muniz . (Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 1/22/2025) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect Civil Cover Sheet used. Please use our districts most current version (12/2024) found on our website www.cand.uscourts.gov. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover SheetThis filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Tina M. Muniz (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2025) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Tina M. Muniz. (Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 1/21/2025) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Judicial Review of Decision of Commissioner of Social Security against Michelle King. Filed by Tina M. Muniz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sackett, Harvey) (Filed on 1/21/2025) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
