Hofmann v. Commissioner of Social Security
Jarrod Hofmann |
Commissioner of Social Security, SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF) and Acting Commissioner Leland Dudek |
5:2025cv00798 |
January 23, 2025 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California |
Eumi K Lee |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SSA Administrative Transcript Notice of Lodging Certified Administrative Record in Electronic Form by Leland Dudek. (Attachments: #1 Part 1, #2 Part 2, #3 Part 3, #4 Part 4, #5 Part 5, #6 Part 6, #7 Part 7, #8 Part 8, #9 Part 9, #10 Part 10, #11 Part 11, #12 Part 12)(Johann, Pamela) (Filed on 3/19/2025) |
Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE. The Court requests that the Commissioner submit one courtesy copy of the administrative record within five court days after electronically filing it. The courtesy copy should be placed in one or more binders. Each document should be tabbed with labels along the right side. The courtesy copy should be submitted to the Clerk's Office and labeled with the case number, "Judge Lee," and "Chambers Copy." (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lrt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2025) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance filed by Erin Highland on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Highland, Erin) (Filed on 1/30/2025) |
![]() |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2025) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jarrod Hofmann.. (Prato, Justin) (Filed on 1/27/2025) |
Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY PROCEDURAL ORDER (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2025) |
![]() |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/6/2025. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2025) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jarrod Hofmann. (Prato, Justin) (Filed on 1/23/2025) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for social secuirty against Commissioner of Social Security. Filed by Jarrod Hofmann. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Prato, Justin) (Filed on 1/23/2025) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.