Tain v. Hennessey, et al
| 3:2003cv01481 |
| July 24, 2003 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Irma E. Gonzalez |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Dft Hennessey's 45 Motion to Dismiss. Court denies Dft's motion w/ respect to Claims 1 and 2. Court grants Dft's motion to dismiss and dismisses w/ prejudice Pla's Claim 3. Court gran ts Dft's motion to dismiss and dismisses w/ leave to amend Pla's Claim 4. If Pla wishes to amend its Complaint, it may do so w/in 20 days of the filing of this Order. Court grants Dft's motion to dismiss and dismisses w/ prejudice Pla's Claim 5. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 12/1/2009. (jah)(jrl).
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER denying in its entirety Defendant's 37 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 7/16/2009. (jah) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER granting Defendant Edward Hennessey's Motion to Set Aside Judgment as Void Pursuant to FRCP 55(c) and Rule 60(b)(4). Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 4/30/20009. (jah) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tain v. Hennessey, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
