Otay Land Company, et al v. United Enterprises, et al
3:2003cv02488 |
December 12, 2003 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Environmental Matters Office |
Roger T. Benitez |
Louisa S Porter |
Both |
Federal Question |
28:1331 Fed. Question |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 444 ORDER Vacating Order Approving Supersedeas Bonds 415 , and Discharging Bond to Plaintiffs and Exonerating the Sureties Thereon. The Clerk of the Court shall release the original copy of the bonds (documents 418, 419, 421, and 422) into the custody of the Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 11/25/13. (cc: Finance)(kaj)(jrd) |
Filing 429 ORDER After Remand Re-Awarding Costs Under 28 U.S. C. § 1919. The Court awards costs to Defendant Phil Scott in the amount of $44,541.62, Defendant Ray Ennis in the amount of $8,659.13, Defendant Olin Corporation in the amount of $ ;30,540.95, Defendant Baldwin Builders in the amount of $116,430.85, and Defendants UE Limited, LP, United Enterprises, LTD, United Enterprises, Inc., John T. Knox and Patrick J. Patel in the amount of $71,818.01. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 5/24/2012.(knb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Otay Land Company, et al v. United Enterprises, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.