Otay Land Company, et al v. United Enterprises, et al
Case Number: 3:2003cv02488
Filed: December 12, 2003
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: Environmental Matters Office
Presiding Judge: Roger T. Benitez
Presiding Judge: Louisa S Porter
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 444 ORDER Vacating Order Approving Supersedeas Bonds 415 , and Discharging Bond to Plaintiffs and Exonerating the Sureties Thereon. The Clerk of the Court shall release the original copy of the bonds (documents 418, 419, 421, and 422) into the custody of the Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 11/25/13. (cc: Finance)(kaj)(jrd)
May 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 429 ORDER After Remand Re-Awarding Costs Under 28 U.S. C. § 1919. The Court awards costs to Defendant Phil Scott in the amount of $44,541.62, Defendant Ray Ennis in the amount of $8,659.13, Defendant Olin Corporation in the amount of $ ;30,540.95, Defendant Baldwin Builders in the amount of $116,430.85, and Defendants UE Limited, LP, United Enterprises, LTD, United Enterprises, Inc., John T. Knox and Patrick J. Patel in the amount of $71,818.01. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 5/24/2012.(knb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Otay Land Company, et al v. United Enterprises, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?