Excelsior College v. Frye, et al

Case Number: 3:2004cv00535
Filed: March 11, 2004
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17:101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 4, 2009 523 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 6/4/09. It is ordered that the Motion for Contempt 494 is granted in part, and the Report and Recommendation 514 is adopted in part. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(tkl) (jrl).
March 25, 2009 514 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Denying Defendant Frye's Ex Parte Application (Doc. 505 ), REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Re: Plaintiff's Motion For Contempt & Certification Of Facts Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 636(e) (Re Doc. 494 ): In addition to whatever sanctions the district court may deem appropriate, this Court recommends Mr. Frye be compelled to immediately: 1) produce copies of all documents responsive to the document request to the Heslin Rothenberg Farley & Mesiti firm; 2) provide further written resp onses, including updated and current information, to all interrogatories addressed, regardless of whether Mr. Frye's prior written response is concluded to be deficient. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leo S. Papas on 3/25/2009. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service.) (mdc) (jrl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Excelsior College v. Frye, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?