Manzo Estate of, et al v. County of San Diego, et al

Case Number: 3:2006cv00060
Filed: January 12, 2006
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
Referring Judge: William McCurine
Presiding Judge: John S. Rhoades
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 3, 2009 90 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 82 Defendant's Motion to Strike and Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's second, fourth, and fifth causes of action are hereby stricken from the Second Amended Complaint. Defendants' motion to dismiss is otherwise denied. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 3/3/09. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(cap) (kaj).
September 3, 2008 73 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Granting In Part and Denying In Part 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court also orders the parties to show cause why the claims brought by the estate of Manzo should not be dismissed for lack of standing. The Court grants the request to file under seal the two exhibits to the Notice of Lodgment dated February 25, 2008. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 8/15/08. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(vet)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Manzo Estate of, et al v. County of San Diego, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?