Martinez, et al v. USA

Plaintiff: Victor Martinez
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 3:2006cv01260
Filed: January 8, 2007
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: Los Angeles
Referring Judge: Jan M. Adler
Presiding Judge: M. James Lorenz
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1346 Tort Claim
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 28, 2007 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Directing the filing of Plaintiff's Motion as a First Amended Complaint: The Clerk of the Court shall file plaintiff's "Motion to file First Amended Complaint as order by the Court Pursuant to FRCP" as the first amended complaint nunc pro tunc to 3/23/07. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 3/28/2007. (mjj, ) (mam).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martinez, et al v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victor Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Samuel William Bettwy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?