Bryan v. McPherson, et al

Case Number: 3:2006cv01487
Filed: July 24, 2006
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
Referring Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Presiding Judge: Larry Alan Burns
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 11, 2011 110 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER on Motion for Clarification 107 . Because all federal claims in this case were dismissed before trial, the state claims are dismissed as well. United Mine Workers of Amer. v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 726 (1966). But the state claims are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). To the extent Bryan's motion seeks reconsideration, it is denied. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/10/11. (kaj)
February 7, 2008 74 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; and granting 71 Joint Motion to Dismiss Defendant Paul Crook with prejudice. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted with regard to Plaintiff's Monell claims, but denied as to Plaintiff's § 1983 claims, state tort claims, and Cal. Civil Code § 52.1 claims. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/6/08. (vrp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bryan v. McPherson, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?