Escamilla v. Giurbino et al
| George Giurbino, A Silva, R Johnson and M P Duran |
| Carlos Escamilla |
| 3:2007cv00353 |
| February 22, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Kern |
| Louisa S Porter |
| Thomas J. Whelan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER Denying (Doc. 50 ) Motion to Appoint Counsel Without Prejudice; Denying (Doc. 50 ) Motion for Extension of Time Without Prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 6/3/2010. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(cap)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 8 Motion for Reconsideration; Vacating Judgment entered 10/1/07; Granting Request for Marshal Service; and Granting Extension of Time to Serve Defendants. The Clerk of Court is directed to vacate the Judgment entered on 10/1/07. The Clerk of Court is directed to provide Plaintiff with an IFP package. The Court will grant Plaintiff an additional sixty days from the date this Order is filed to complete service. It is further ordered the U.S. Marshall shall, within 30 days of rece iving Plaintiff's updated ISMS Form 285s effect service of Plaintiff's Complaint and summons upon Defendants as directed by Plaintiff. All costs of service shall be advanced by the United States pursuant to this Order. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 12/5/07. (aje)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
