Ollier et al v. Sweetwater Union High School District et al
| Veronica Ollier, Naudia Rangel, Maritza Rangel, Amanda Hernandez and Arianna Hernandez |
| Sweetwater Union High School District, Arlie N Ricasa, Pearl Quinones, Jim Cartmill, Jaime Mercado, Greg R Sandoval, Jesus M Gandara, Earl Weins and Russell Moore |
| 3:2007cv00714 |
| April 19, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| M. James Lorenz |
| William McCurine |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
353
ORDER adopting 352 Report and Recommendation. The Joint Motion to Withdraw Enforcement Motion and Vacate Order to Show Cause (doc. no. 346 ) is granted, including the request to withdraw of Plaintiffs Motion to Enforce Permanent Injunction (doc. no. 225), and discharge the Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not Be Held in Contempt (doc. no. 249). Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/28/2020. (jpp)
|
|
Filing
352
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 346 Joint MOTION to Withdraw 249 Order on Motion to Enforce Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 7/09/2020.(jpp)
|
|
Filing
249
ORDER granting 225 Motion to Enforce Permanent Injunction and Setting Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not Be Held in Contempt. The statement of cause shall be filed on or before March 31, 2014. Plaintiffs may file a response to defendants statement of cause on or before April 14, 2014. A hearing may be scheduled on the contempt issue after briefing has concluded and at the Courts discretion. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 3/17/2014. (sjt)
|
|
Filing
204
ORDER denying 197 Motion for More Amended, Additional or New Findings. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 6/21/2012. (mtb)
|
|
Filing
193
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. The parties shall submit the proposed compliance plan within 45 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 2/9/2012.(mtb)
|
|
Filing
186
ORDER granting 183 Motion to Strike Trial Testimony Concerning Connect-Ed Phone System. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 11/30/10. (lmt)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER Denying 125 Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Retaliation Claim: IT IS ORDERED defendants motion to strike plaintiffs third cause of action for retaliation or alternatively to exclude evidence of retaliation is DENIED. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 8/23/2010. (mjj)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER Granting 140 Ex Parte Motion to Bifurcate Trial Conditioned on Waiver of a Second Trial. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/29/2010. (mjj)
|
|
Filing
139
ORDER Denying 138 Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fourth Claim for Relief: Because notice to class members is required when a voluntary dismissal of a claim is proposed, the parties joint motion to dismiss plaintiffs fourth claim for relief is DENIED. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 7/12/2010. (mjj)
|
|
Filing
135
ORDER Granting 111 MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony; and Granting 126 MOTION to Exclude 38 Witnesses: IT IS ORDERED: 1. GRANTING plaintiffs motion to exclude the expert testimony of Peter Schiff and Penny Parker; and 2. GRANTING plaintiffs motion to exclude witnesses not previously disclosed. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/26/2010.(mjj) (jrl).
|
|
Filing
131
ORDER Denying 107 Motion for Advisory Jury. Signed by Judge M. James Lorenz on 4/15/2010. (mjj) (jrl).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
