Crenshaw v. California Board of Prison Terms

Petitioner: Ralph Edward Crenshaw
Respondent: California Board of Prison Terms
Case Number: 3:2007cv01107
Filed: June 18, 2007
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: Imperial
Referring Judge: William McCurine
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey T. Miller
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 2, 2007 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice and with leave to amend. Signed by Judge Jeffrey T. Miller on 7/2/07; bland request to proceed forma pauperis form and blank Amended petition form mailed.(tkl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crenshaw v. California Board of Prison Terms
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ralph Edward Crenshaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: California Board of Prison Terms
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?